🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.